19.01.2024; Кривий Ріг, Україна: II Міжнародна наукова конференція «Період трансформаційних процесів в світовій науці: задачі та виклики»
Роботи, що індексуються в Google Scholar

METABOLISM OF TOBACCO CELL CULTURES UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF LONG-TERM SALINITY

  • L. Bronnikova ,
  • I. Zaitseva
PDF

Опубліковано 01.02.2024

Як цитувати

Bronnikova , L., & Zaitseva , I. (2024). METABOLISM OF TOBACCO CELL CULTURES UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF LONG-TERM SALINITY. Матеріали конференцій МЦНД, (19.01.2024; Кривий Ріг, Україна), 275–277. вилучено із https://archive.mcnd.org.ua/index.php/conference-proceeding/article/view/976

Завантаження

Дані завантаження ще не доступні.

Авторське право (c) 2024 L. Bronnikova , I. Zaitseva

Creative Commons License

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Google Scholar

Анотація

Global climate change and acute shortages of fresh water, even for drinking, impede the cultivation of valuable economic crops. Among abiotic stresses, the most harmful effect is osmotic stress - salinity [4, 8, 9]. There is a need to obtain plant forms that combine resistance to various stresses with satisfactory consumer qualities. The needs of the current moment determine the directions of scientific research and stimulate the development of new research methods. Currently, new biotechnological methods that use micro and even nanotechnology are being actively created. At the same time, the ideology of environmental safety is becoming a priority, both for the approach itself and for the product it produces [2, 3, 5].

PDF

Посилання

  1. Gamborg J.L., Miller R.A., Ojima K. 1968. Nutrient requirement of suspension cultures of soybean root. Exp. Cell Res. 225; 151 – 158.
  2. Zhang Y., Xu J., Li R., Ge Y.,Li Y. 2023. Plants' response to abiotic stress: mechanisms and strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24(13); 10915. https://doi.org/10.3390/10.3390/ijms241310915
  3. Imran Q.M., Falak N., Hussan A., Man B.- G., Yun B. – W. 2021. Abiotic stress biotechnological tools in stress respontnce. J. Agronomy, 11(8), 15-79. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081579
  4. Maryum Z., Luqman T., Nadeem S., Khan S.M.U.D., Wang B., Ditta A., Khan M.K.R. 2022. An overview of salinity stress, mechanism of salinity tolerance and strategies for its management in cotton. Front. Plant Sci. 13; 907937. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.907937
  5. Zhang H., Zhu J., Gong Z., Zhu J-K. 2020. Abiotic stress responses in plant. Nature Reviews Genetics. 23; 104 – 119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00413-0
  6. Xu X., Smaczniak C.,Muino J.M., Kaufmann K. 2021. Cell identity specification in plants: lessons from flower development. Journal of Experimental Botany. 72(12), 4202 – 4217. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab110
  7. Spormann S., Nadais P., Sousa F., Pinto M., Martins M., Sousa B., Fidalgo F., Soares C. 2023. Accumulation of proline in plants under contaminated soils – are we on the same page? Antioxidants. 12(3); 665 – 674. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12030666
  8. Hasanuzzaman M., Fujita M. 2022. Plant responses and tolerance to salt stress: physiological and molecular intervention. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23(9); 4810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094810
  9. Xiao F., Zhou H. 2022. Plant salt response perception, signaling and tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 13; 1 – 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls2022.10.53699
  10. Sergeeva L.E., Mykhalska S.I. 2019. Cell selection with heavy metal ions for obtaining salt tolerant plant cell cultures. Physiology Plant and Genetic. 51(4); 315 – 323 https://doi.org/10.15407/frg2019.04.315
  11. Garramone R., Coppola G.P., Aversano R., Docimo T., Sedlak P., Carputo D. 2023. In vitro assessment of salt stress tolerance in wild potato species. Agronomy.13; 1784. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy1371784